Comments for Magicians for 911 Truth

Comment on About Magicians for 911 Truth by Lisa

Lisa — Mon, 16 Jan 2012 22:45:52 +0000

I have a book to sell which would be of interest to truthers
Do you provide ad space on your website or eblasts to members?
If so, can you provide me with the cost to do so?
Many thanks
LIsa

Comment on Psychologists help 9/11 truth deniers by Thomas Potter

Thomas Potter — Sat, 03 Dec 2011 02:57:55 +0000

WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO? by Dr. Judy Wood is neither a political nor conspiratorial work. This 500 page full-color hardcover textbook is a forensic scientific investigation into the events of 9/11. Because of Dr. Judy Wood and her 10 years of forensic scientific research into the “dustification” of the World Trade Center complex readers of WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO? will now know what forensic evidence “magnetic-electrogravitic-nuclear reactions” leave behind when this technology is used again on unsuspecting and innocent victims for the sake of oil industry interests.

On 9/11 over a half mile of vertical building height, containing nearly 150 football fields of floor space, was reduced to a near-level field of dust and debris, where rescue workers walked horizontally or rappelled into empty caverns to look for survivors. How was this possible given the standard laws of engineering and physics? The 9/11 Commission Report bypassed this central issue, as did the report of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Contrary to its stated objective of determining ‘why and how WTC 1 and WTC 2 collapsed,’ the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) made the stunning admission that it did not investigate how the towers fell. Neither the standard view that the Twin Towers collapsed from fire nor the standard opposition view that they were intentionally detonated by thermite explosives explains the evidence, nor do they follow the laws of engineering and physics. Dr. Wood left Clemson to research the 9/11 conundrum full time, and she has focused her research strictly on physical evidence and scientific principles. WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO? provides an understandable, credible, and photo-enhanced summary of Dr. Wood’s disturbing findings, which resulted in her lawsuit against the contractors of the NIST report.

Dr. Judy Wood earned a Ph.D. Degree from Virginia Tech and is a former professor of mechanical engineering. She has research expertise in experimental stress analysis, structural mechanics, deformation analysis, materials characterization and materials engineering science. Her research has involved testing materials, including complex-material systems, in the area of photomechanics, or the use of optical and image-analysis methods to determine physical properties of materials and measure how materials respond to forces placed on them. Her area of expertise involves interferometry.

She taught graduate and undergraduate engineering classes and has authored or co-authored over 60 peer-reviewed papers in her areas of expertise.

In the time since 9/11/01, she has applied her expertise in materials science, image analysis and interferometry, to a forensic study of over 40,000 images, hundreds of video clips and a large volume of witness testimony pertaining to the destruction of the WTC complex. Dr. Wood has conducted a comprehensive forensic investigation of what physically happened to the World Trade Center site on 9/11. And, based on her analysis of the evidence she gathered, in 2007, she filed a federal qui tam case for science fraud against the contractors who contributed to the official NIST report about the destruction of the WTC. This case was filed in the US Supreme Court in Dec 2009. To this day, Dr. Wood’s investigation is the only comprehensive forensic investigation in the public domain.

WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO?
ISBN-13: 978-0-615-41256-6
ISBN-10: 0615412564
Library of Congress Control Number: 2010916516
http://wheredidthetowersgo.com/buy/

Comment on The pentagon was not hit by a airliner. See for yourself by Lynn

Lynn — Wed, 11 May 2011 00:00:32 +0000

Would some of the magicians in this group explain how the techniques used in a magic show could have contributed to the idea that a plane did hit the pentagon when it actually did not?

Comment on Giuliani admits he was told towers would collapse, FEMA ready to go on 9-10-01 by admin

admin — Sat, 19 Dec 2009 09:18:27 +0000

Okay, I would like to see historical references to any buildings that have collapsed due to fire. Please post here.

Comment on 9/11 Commissioner Bob Kerrey finally confesses 9-11 Commission could not do it’s job – Part 1 of 3 by Darryl Coleman

Darryl Coleman — Sat, 19 Dec 2009 08:23:22 +0000

I discovered your homepage by coincidence.
Very interesting posts and well written.
I will put your site on my blogroll.

Comment on Larry Silverstein confronted on WTC7 by admin

admin — Sun, 13 Dec 2009 04:03:40 +0000

Hello Karin,

Yes, there are several. I use a Firefox extension called “DownloadHelper”. In Firefox, click on “tools” then “add-ons” then “get add-ons” and search for DownloadHelper. Another one I’ve heard of is KeepVid. I hope this helps. I also reloaded the missing video so I hope you come back to this post to check it out!

Comment on Larry Silverstein confronted on WTC7 by Karin Wells

Karin Wells — Thu, 10 Dec 2009 05:12:02 +0000

Alas, another video not available any more – might you have another link?

Also, I have found that some key videos I have seen sometimes “disappear.” Do you know of any software that can capture video seeon on the screen and archive it safely on our home computers?

Comment on Vice President Biden confronted with evidence of explosions in the Twin Towers by Karin Wells

Karin Wells — Thu, 10 Dec 2009 05:01:02 +0000

That’s a depressing reaction. But thanks for finding the actual video.

Comment on Giuliani admits he was told towers would collapse, FEMA ready to go on 9-10-01 by admin

admin — Thu, 10 Dec 2009 00:18:00 +0000

Yet, there are many videos of Giullanni and Bush saying nobody knew those buildings would collapse. Which is it? And, yes, I would love to see your case studies of other buildings that have fallen due to fire. Every building fire I’ve seen has left the building standing (or at least the frame of the building). How do three huge sky scrapers fall at free fall speed? It was as if there was ZERO resistance to the collapse. Those floors under the airplane impact where structurally sound. Yet, when the buildings collapse, there is no proof of any resistance. All of that steel below is designed to resist a collapse. Yes, all 3 buildings fall as if there was nothing below the impact zones resisting the collapses… No buildings naturally fall at free fall speed without some kind of help!

Comment on Giuliani admits he was told towers would collapse, FEMA ready to go on 9-10-01 by admin

admin — Thu, 10 Dec 2009 00:12:06 +0000

If that’s the case, how come the 9/11 commission report just didn’t say that it was brought down on purpose? Why are they still claiming it was fire when you’re claiming they admitted to pull the building down on purpose? Don’t you think if they brought it down on purpose, we should know that? Why is the government still claiming it was a fire when you seem to know it was pulled down on purpose? WTC 6 was almost completely destroyed from the two towers, it was a complete loss so they took the rest of it down. How come no one is admitting they “pulled” WTC7 down on purpose like in your theory? Not even the government is trying to say that about WTC7…