Magicians for 911 Truth gets mentioned in the press!

“…Gage got a standing ovation, and audience members lined up at three microphones to ask questions.

“Hi, I’m David with Magicians for 9/11 Truth,” said one questioner.

That actually is a group, at least according to a website that says, “We believe that, just like in performing magic, there may have been the use of misdirection & deception involved with the events of September 11th.”

Read the full St. Paul Pioneer Press article (about half way into the article is the kind mention of our group)

Media Scrambles as Bin Laden Story Crumbles

While the establishment media was busy parroting President Obama’s announcement of Osama bin Laden’s supposed assassination, reporting the unsubstantiated claims as if they were unquestionable facts, much of the so-called “alternative” press was far more cautious — and accurate, it turns out. But more importantly, with the new official storyline indicating that bin Laden was in fact unarmed, bigger and much more important questions are beginning to emerge. In terms of coverage, it turns out that the skeptical approach proved far superior in terms of getting it right. Countless mainstream sources were so confident in Obama’s word that they reported many of the claims as fact without even attributing them to the President.

But the official White House narrative has been changed so many times in recent days that now it’s almost unrecognizable. There wasn‘t even a fire fight; yet this was one of the crucial elements of the original story that justified the assassination of a person the government painted as the most valuable source of information on the planet — the leader of al-Qaeda. And in reporting the statements as fact, the establishment press has officially been left with egg all over its face again.

“[Bin Laden] was engaged in a firefight with those that entered the area of the house he was in,” said terror czar John Brennan. Similarly, Obama said that “after a firefight, they killed Osama bin Laden and took custody of his body.” The next day, however, the White House spokesman admitted bin Laden “was not armed.” Trying to save face and justify the killing of an unarmed man, the spokesman added, without elaborating, that “resistance does not require a firearm.”

More than a few other important parts of the storyline have been altered, contradicted, or simply exposed as false, too. Everything from which of  bin Laden’s sons was supposedly killed to the claim that his wife was killed after being used as a “human shield” — all of it has changed for some reason or another. The transcript after Brennan’s speech was altered to change the name of the dead son. The new and improved narrative now says that not only was bin Laden’s wife not killed, but that she was not used as a human shield.

Originally the White House also suggested top officials watched the raid live through a video feed. Terror czar Brennan, for example, claimed that they “had real-time visibility into the progress of the operation.” CIA boss Leon Panetta later exposed that claim as false in an interview with PBS, saying: “There was a time period of almost 20 or 25 minutes that we really didn’t know just exactly what was going on.”

That means the “photo op” of Obama and other officials intently “watching” the operation in the “Situation Room” was almost certainly staged for the press. And almost every media outlet that ran the picture used inaccurate captions parroting the White House claims.

Read the entire story here

Jessie Ventura and Alex Jones on the newly released videos

(Thanks to 911Blogger)

Jesse Ventura: 9/11 Footage Shows FBI Director Asking FDNY Film Crew About “Secondary Hit” 1/4

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SNuXWUqzE-Y&feature=related

Part 2 of 4:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Q0kqRtmGp8&feature=related

Part 3 of 4:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RsbHYtdSM7s&feature=related

Part 4 of 4:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rzzb8q-yuEk&feature=related

wtc lease holder admits building brought down by controlled demolition

Check out the lease holder of the World Trade Center buildings in NYC
admit he made the decision to demolish WTC#7 on 9/11. It’s only 24 seconds long.

Things we now need to ask ourselves.

1. Why is it that almost nobody knows or remembers this 3rd
building
?
Why hasn’t the media reported on it since that day? That
size building in most American metro cities would be the tallest building in the
skyline. It had offices of FBI, CIA and other federal agencies.

2. If he did really “pull it”, how did Larry rig the building so fast? Or was it already
pre-rigged for a demolition as a “safety precaution”? If so, that opens up the question:
“were the twin towers also pre-rigged for demolition?”

=============Now here’s the latest BOMBSHELL ===============

A Fox News hit piece against Jesse Ventura and the 9/11 truth movement written by former
Washington D.C. prosecutor Jeffrey Scott Shapiro inadvertently reveals a shocking truth, that
World Trade Center leaseholder Larry Silverstein, who collected nearly $500 million dollars
in insurance as a result of the collapse of Building 7, a 47-story structure that was not hit by a
plane but collapsed within seven seconds on 9/11, was on the phone to his insurance
carrier attempting to convince them that the building should be brought down via
controlled demolition.

Here’s an excerpt from the published an article on April 22, 2010.

“Shortly before the building [WTC 7] collapsed, several NYPD officers and Con-Edison workers told me that Larry Silverstein…was on the phone with his insurance carrier to see if they would authorize the controlled demolition of the building – since its foundation was already unstable and expected to fall.

Larry Silverstein himself was considering a controlled demolition! And then, the building
“collapses” and it looks just like a controlled demolition! Hymm, what a coincidence!

1+1=2  PLEASE DO THE MATH!!!
(and share with everyone you know!)